2025 SCEC Community Stress Drop Validation Workshop

Date: February 25, 2025 (9:00am – 3:00 pm Pacific)
Location: Online via Zoom
Workshop Organizers: Annemarie Baltay (USGS), Rachel Abercrombie (Boston University)
SCEC Award and Report: 24067

Summary

The SCEC/ USGS Community Stress Drop Validation Group was formed in 2021 to understand the physical controls and methodological reasons for variance in stress drops, so that they can be used reliably by the earthquake science community. The main activities over the past three years were to use a common dataset of earthquake records from the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence by members of the community, to estimate stress drop, corner frequency, or other point-source spectral estimates of the earthquake energetics. To date, over 20 different research groups have participated in submitting source parameter estimates and a very successful BSSA special issue is well underway discussing much of this work. Papers already published online are listed at the bottom of the page.

The workshop will be conducted in three parts:

Part I: is to compare and contrast the results obtained to date, discussing where we agree and disagree. We invite participants to contribute to the discussion in answering questions such as: How did this experience cause you to change your methods and procedures? What do you now think should be in a “best practice manual” for measuring spectral stress drop? What are the things we need to focus on to resolve outstanding differences in results? We expect to include discussion of apparent discrepancies in stress drop scaling with magnitude and depth, as well as differences in site and path attenuation functions. 

Part II will present a first synthetic dataset that we hope people will be willing to process with their various methods, focused on understanding uncertainties in isolating source, path and site using band-limited spectra. These synthetic time-series waveforms were developed with the Stochastic Method of Simulation (SMSIM) using a range of input source, path and site parameters. 

Part III is focused on enabling this active and ongoing community research to continue, defining its direction, and obtaining necessary support (for the organisation of the community and for individual participants). We envisage writing a collaborative NSF proposal and invite all interested to join as co-PIs, or (non-funded) supporters/collaborators. 

 As always, the majority of the workshop will be discussion focussed, and we welcome broad community participation throughout the workshop.

Presentation materials may be viewed by clicking the links below. PLEASE NOTE: Files are the author’s property. They may contain unpublished or preliminary information and should only be used for reviewing the talk. Only the presentations for which SCEC has received permission to post publicly are included below.

February 25, 2025

TimeAgenda ItemSpeaker
09:00 - 11:00

Session 1: Welcome + Discussion of BSSA Special Issue

Rachel Abercrombie and Annemarie Baltay

09:00 - 09:15Welcome and Overview of Workshop ObjectivesAnnemarie Baltay and Rachel Abercrombie
09:15 - 11:00Discussion of BSSA Special Issue: Focus on any outstanding lack of consensus and Pros and Cons of methods. Informal contributions from Authors
11:00 - 11:30Break
11:30 - 12:30

Session 2: Synthetic Data for Community Stress Drop

Presentation and Discussion of Stochastic simulated data-set for community analysisAnnemarie Baltay, Peter Shearer, Rachel Abercrombie
12:30 - 13:00Break
13:00 - 14:30

Session 3: Looking Forward to an NSF Proposal. Who’s interested?

Brief Introductory presentation and Community DiscussionAll
14:30Workshop Adjourns

SCEC-USGS Ridgecrest Stress Validation Study

Using a common dataset, researchers estimate stress drop from the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As a community we will compare and validate the estimates to determine physical controls on stress drop variability. Current focus on 55 specific events. For more information, see the SCEC Technical Activity Group (TAG) for Community Stress Drop Validation Group 

Participants

Name and Org
RachelAbercrombieBoston UniversityRachel Abercrombie
(Boston University)
Byeong SeokAhnPukyong National UniversityByeong Seok Ahn
(Pukyong National University)
NikosAnterriotisAristotle University of ThessalonikiNikos Anterriotis
(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
PabloAravenaSLUPablo Aravena
(SLU)
RalphArchuletaUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRalph Archuleta
(University of California, Santa Barbara)
KrisAstraUniversity of OxfordKris Astra
(University of Oxford)
AnnemarieBaltayUSGSAnnemarie Baltay
(USGS)
MichaelBarallUSGSMichael Barall
(USGS)
LouisaBaramaLLNLLouisa Barama
(LLNL)
GraceBarcheckCornell UniversityGrace Barcheck
(Cornell University)
LuisBazanUniversity of MemphisLuis Bazan
(University of Memphis)
NickBeelerUSGSNick Beeler
(USGS)
Raul BenjaminMendozaUniversity of British ColumbiaRaul Benjamin Mendoza
(University of British Columbia)
DinoBindiHelmholtz Centre for Geosciences-GFZDino Bindi
(Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences-GFZ)
DaveBooreDave Boore
OliverBoydUSGSOliver Boyd
(USGS)
RayCAKIRWGSRay CAKIR
(WGS)
GiovannaCalderoniINGVGiovanna Calderoni
(INGV)
AmilcarCarrera CevallosAmilcar Carrera Cevallos
EstebanChavesOVSICORI Costa RicaEsteban Chaves
(OVSICORI Costa Rica)
XiaoweiChenTexas A&M UniversityXiaowei Chen
(Texas A&M University)
SungwonChoSaint Louis UniversitySungwon Cho
(Saint Louis University)
ShannaChuFervo EnergyShanna Chu
(Fervo Energy)
TimClementsUSGSTim Clements
(USGS)
ElizabethCochranUSGSElizabeth Cochran
(USGS)
SofiaCubillosMITSofia Cubillos
(MIT)
SusanaCustodioUniversity of LisbonSusana Custodio
(University of Lisbon)
LuisDalguer3Q-Lab SwitzerlandLuis Dalguer
(3Q-Lab Switzerland)
ZoyaFarajpourBMKGZoya Farajpour
(BMKG)
IoannisFountoulakisNOAIoannis Fountoulakis
(NOA)
FrantišekGallovičCharles University, PragueFrantišek Gallovič
(Charles University, Prague)
Humberto AlfonsoGarcía MontanoCIACE UNAN-ManaguaHumberto Alfonso García Montano
(CIACE UNAN-Managua)
MisraGedikBogazici UniversityMisra Gedik
(Bogazici University)
SandroGomesUFRNSandro Gomes
(UFRN)
VladimirGraizerNuclear Regulatory CommissionVladimir Graizer
(Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
HaoGuoUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonHao Guo
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
SangwooHanSeoul National UniversitySangwoo Han
(Seoul National University)
StephenHartzellUSGSStephen Hartzell
(USGS)
TaimoorHassanBahria University PakistanTaimoor Hassan
(Bahria University Pakistan)
GrégoireHellerCEA, FranceGrégoire Heller
(CEA, France)
StephenHickmanUSGSStephen Hickman
(USGS)
JoannaHolmgrenNORSARJoanna Holmgren
(NORSAR)
XinrongHouCSUXinrong Hou
(CSU)
YiheHuangUniversity of MichiganYihe Huang
(University of Michigan)
ChenJiUCSBChen Ji
(UCSB)
ZheJiaUTIG UT AustinZhe Jia
(UTIG UT Austin)
JunleJiangUniversity of OklahomaJunle Jiang
(University of Oklahoma)
Jedidiah JoelAguirreETH ZürichJedidiah Joel Aguirre
(ETH Zürich)
LavJoshiCharles UniversityLav Joshi
(Charles University)
YoshiKanekoKyoto UniversityYoshi Kaneko
(Kyoto University)
TatianaKartsevaISTerre FranceTatiana Kartseva
(ISTerre France)
Chun-YuKeNational Taiwan UniversityChun-Yu Ke
(National Taiwan University)
DebiKilbUCSD SIODebi Kilb
(UCSD SIO)
BrianKilgoreUSGSBrian Kilgore
(USGS)
TreyKnudsonStanford UniversityTrey Knudson
(Stanford University)
OlgaKtenidouNational Observatory of AthensOlga Ktenidou
(National Observatory of Athens)
CareneLarmatLos Alamos National LaboratoryCarene Larmat
(Los Alamos National Laboratory)
JaeseokLeeBrownJaeseok Lee
(Brown)
GerardoLeon SotoUMSNHGerardo Leon Soto
(UMSNH)
YangyangLiNanJing UniversityYangyang Li
(NanJing University)
JiayueLinPolitecnico Di MilanoJiayue Lin
(Politecnico Di Milano)
ItzhakLiorHebrew UniversityItzhak Lior
(Hebrew University)
SemechahLuiUniversity of Toronto CanadaSemechah Lui
(University of Toronto Canada)
KarenLuttrellLSUKaren Luttrell
(LSU)
NathanMaierLANLNathan Maier
(LANL)
SavvasMarcouUC BerkeleySavvas Marcou
(UC Berkeley)
KevinMayedaAFTACKevin Mayeda
(AFTAC)
HaoranMengSUSTechHaoran Meng
(SUSTech)
DoronMoradUniversity of California Santa CruzDoron Morad
(University of California Santa Cruz)
FrancescoMosconiSapienza University of RomeFrancesco Mosconi
(Sapienza University of Rome)
TaimiMulderNRCanTaimi Mulder
(NRCan)
JohnNabelekOSUJohn Nabelek
(OSU)
AnnOleshCal Poly PomonaAnn Olesh
(Cal Poly Pomona)
AdrienOthECGS LuxembourgAdrien Oth
(ECGS Luxembourg)
GuanningPangCornell University Guanning Pang
(Cornell University )
EdricPaukUSC/SCECEdric Pauk
(USC/SCEC)
AndresPena CastroUniversity of New MexicoAndres Pena Castro
(University of New Mexico)
CarsonPenningtonUT DallasCarson Pennington
(UT Dallas)
ColinPenningtonLLNLColin Pennington
(LLNL)
MarkPetersenUSGSMark Petersen
(USGS)
Camilo IgnacioPinilla RamosUSC/SCECCamilo Ignacio Pinilla Ramos
(USC/SCEC)
FatimaRamadanUniversity of OxfordFatima Ramadan
(University of Oxford)
ZeevRechesOklahoma UniversityZeev Reches
(Oklahoma University)
BadieRowshandelCEABadie Rowshandel
(CEA)
ClaudioSatrianoIPGP FranceClaudio Satriano
(IPGP France)
NatalieSchaalCSUNNatalie Schaal
(CSUN)
Min-SeongSeoSeoul National UniversityMin-Seong Seo
(Seoul National University)
JuanSepulvedaUniversity of CanterburyJuan Sepulveda
(University of Canterbury)
PeterShearerUC San DiegoPeter Shearer
(UC San Diego)
KazuhiroSomeiGRIKazuhiro Somei
(GRI)
MonikaStaszekIGF PANMonika Staszek
(IGF PAN)
JaleenaSunnyETH ZurichJaleena Sunny
(ETH Zurich)
MarianoSupinoINGVMariano Supino
(INGV)
Muhammad NajibSyami MBMKGMuhammad Najib Syami M
(BMKG)
CorinaTecuoiqCorina Tecu
(oiq)
FabiaTerraUC BerkeleyFabia Terra
(UC Berkeley)
Ann MariamThomasNorthwesternAnn Mariam Thomas
(Northwestern)
CliffThurberUW-MadisonCliff Thurber
(UW-Madison)
ElisaTintiSapienza University RomeElisa Tinti
(Sapienza University Rome)
DanielTrugmanUNRDaniel Trugman
(UNR)
TakahikoUchideGeological Survey of Japan AISTTakahiko Uchide
(Geological Survey of Japan AIST)
Marcelvan LaatenFSU Jena GermanyMarcel van Laaten
(FSU Jena Germany)
IanVandevertSIO/UCSDIan Vandevert
(SIO/UCSD)
RicardoVazquez RosasUMSNHRicardo Vazquez Rosas
(UMSNH)
FelixWaldhauserColumbia UniversityFelix Waldhauser
(Columbia University)
NadavWetzlerGeological Survey of IsraelNadav Wetzler
(Geological Survey of Israel)
Ming-HsuanYenGFZMing-Hsuan Yen
(GFZ)
ClaraYoonUSGSClara Yoon
(USGS)
YuehuaZengUSGSYuehua Zeng
(USGS)
AndreaAttolicoUniversity of Rome "La Sapienza" Andrea Attolico
(University of Rome "La Sapienza")

Papers already Accepted for the BSSA Special Issue on Improving Measurements of Earthquake Source Parameters 

DOIs become valid when the paper is published in advance, online. 
*indicates directly related to Ridgecrest Community Validation Study. 

  • *Impact of geometric spreading in the Fourier domain on source spectra: observations of steep amplitude decay and frequency dependence from the 2019 Ridgecrest, California earthquake sequence. authors:  Gail Atkinson  doi.org/10.1785/0120240005
  • Energy-magnitude station corrections across the conterminous United States authors:  Dino Bindi, Domenico Di Giacomo doi.org/10.1785/0120240092
  • The impact of source time function complexity on stress drop estimates. authors:  James Scott Neely, Sunyoung Park, Annemarie Baltay doi.org/10.1785/0120240022
  • Resolving the Variability Discrepancy Between Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Stress Drop: Insight from Double-Corner-Frequency Spectra. authors:  Shota Shimmoto, Hiroe Miyake doi.org/10.1785/0120240038
  • Coda Envelope Moment Magnitudes and Source Scaling for Southeastern Canada. authors:  Allison L. Bent, Kevin Mayeda, Jorge I. Roman‐Nieves, Justin Barno doi.org/10.1785/0120240139
  • Using a 1-D Radially Symmetric Coda Envelope Model For Robust Moment ‎Magnitude (Mw) Estimation In Iraq’s Tectonically Diverse Zones. authors:  Muntadher Al‐Kaabi, Kevin Mayeda, Jorge Roman‐Nieves, Andrea Chiang, Hanan Mahdi, Haydar Al‐Shukri doi.org/10.1785/0120240113
  • Stress drop variations of (a)seismic fault segments in the Sea of Marmara region (NW Türkiye) supported by different methodological approaches. authors:  Xiang Chen, Grzegorz Kwiatek, Dino Bindi, Dirk Becker, Marco Bohnhoff, Fabrice Cotton, Patricia Martínez‐Garzón doi.org/10.1785/0120240128
  • *Numerical tests to evaluate the effect of constraining the spectral shape of reference events on source parameter scaling. authors:  Dino Bindi, Kevin Mayeda, Daniele Spallarossa, Matteo Picozzi, Adrien Oth, Paola Morasca, William R. Walter doi.org/10.1785/0120240132
  • Scaling and depth variability of source parameters in central and southern Italy using regional attenuation models. authors:  Dino Bindi, Daniele Spallarossa, Matteo Picozzi, Gabriele Tarchini doi.org/10.1785/0120240144
  • Time dependent stress drop variations after large earthquakes along the North Chilean megathrust. authors:  Jonas Folesky, Jörn Kummerow doi.org/10.1785/0120240121
  • *SCEC/USGS Community Stress Drop Validation Study: How Spectral Fitting Approaches Influence Measured Source Parameters. authors:  Elizabeth S. Cochran, Annemarie Baltay, Shanna Chu, Rachel E. Abercrombie, Dino Bindi, Xiaowei Chen, Grace A. Parker, Colin Pennington, Peter M. Shearer, Daniel T. Trugman doi.org/10.1785/0120240140
  • *Ridgecrest aftershock stress drops from P- and S-wave spectral decomposition. authors:  Ian C. Vandevert, Peter M. Shearer, Wenyuan Fan doi.org/10.1785/0120240133
  • *Capturing broadband spectral characteristics of moderate-sized earthquakes using nearby recordings: A case study of 42 M 4.0-5.4 Ridgecrest earthquakes. authors:  Chen Ji, Ralph J. Archuleta, Aaron Peyton doi.org/10.1785/0120240180
  • *Source Scaling Comparison and Validation for Ridgecrest, CA: Radiated Energy, Apparent Stress, and Mw Using the Coda Calibration Tool (2.6<Mw<7.1). authors:  Kevin Mayeda, Dino Bindi, Jorge Roman‐Nieves, Paola Morasca, Douglas Dreger, Chen Ji, Taka’aki Taira, Ralph Archuleta, William R. Walter, Justin Barno doi.org/10.1785/0120240143
  • *Characterizing Directivity in Small (M3-5) Aftershocks of the Ridgecrest Sequence. authors:  Shanna Chu, Annemarie Baltay, Rachel Abercrombie doi.org/10.1785/0120240146
  • *Earthquake source spectra estimates vary widely for two Ridgecrest aftershocks because of differences in attenuation corrections. authors:  Peter M. Shearer, Ian Vandevert, Wenyuan Fan, Rachel E. Abercrombie, Dino Bindi, Giovanna Calderoni, Xiaowei Chen, William Ellsworth, Rebecca Harrington, Yihe Huang, Trey Knudson, Meggy Roßbach, Claudio Satriano, Mariano Supino, Daniel T. Trugman, Hongfeng Yang, Jiewen Zhang doi.org/10.1785/0120240134
  • *Quantifying Magnitude Uncertainty of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Through a Sensitivity Study of the Relative Magnitude Method. authors:  Sydney L. Gable, Yihe Huang doi.org/10.1785/0120240126
  • *Combining two distinct methods to resolve spatial variation in attenuation and earthquake source parameters. authors:  Giovanna Calderoni, Rachel E. Abercrombie doi.org/10.1785/0120240160
  • Earthquake stress drop, source spectra from laboratory experiments and the apparent unsteadiness of frictional slip. authors:  Brian Kilgore, N. M. Beeler doi.org/10.1785/0120240123 (in press)
  • Exploring uncertainty in moment estimation for small earthquakes in Southern Nevada using the coda envelope method. authors:  Anne M. Patton, Colin N. Pennington, William R. Walter, Daniel T. Trugman doi.org/10.1785/0120240120 (in press)
  • Importance of considering near-surface attenuation in earthquake source parameter estimation: Insights from Kappa at a dense array in Oklahoma. authors:  Hilary Chang, Rachel E. Abercrombie, Nori Nakata doi.org/10.1785/0120240137
  • *Source Parameter Analysis Using Maximum Amplitudes in the Time Domain. authors:  Trey C. Knudson, William L. Ellsworth, Gregory C. Beroza doi.org/10.1785/0120240198
  • Seismic energy radiated by earthquakes in the north-central region of the Gulf of California, Mexico. authors:  Favio Cruz Hernández, Raúl R. Castro doi.org/10.1785/0120240096
  • Source Characteristics of Tectonic and Induced Events near St. Gallen, Switzerland: Utilizing the Empirical Green’s Function Method and Generalized Inversion Technique. authors:  SeongJu Jeong, Semechah K. Y. Lui doi.org/10.1785/0120240145
  • Earthquake Source Parameter Estimation using Distributed Acoustic Sensing and Frequency Wavenumber Scaling. authors:  Itzhak Lior doi.org/10.1785/0120240117 (in press)
  • *Source parameter estimation using site-corrected source spectra for the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in Southern California. authors:  Byeong Seok Ahn, Tae-Seob Kang, Hyun Jae Yoo doi.org/10.1785/0120240157 (in press)
  • On seismological stress-drop estimates for earthquake sources simulated on rate-and-state faults. authors:  Yen-Yu Lin, Natalie Schaal, Nadia Lapusta doi.org/10.1785/0120240147 (in press)
  • Kinematic source modeling using radiation-corrected empirical Green’s functions in waveform inversion. authors:  Ritsuya Shibata, Naofumi Aso doi.org/10.1785/0120240077 (in press)
  • *Comparison of EGF methods for Ridgecrest Sequence: Can EGFs help resolve ambiguity in isolating source spectra? authors: Rachel Abercrombie, Xiaowei Chen, Yihe Huang, and Shanna Chu doi.org/10.1785/0120240161 (in press)
  • *Overview of The SCEC/USGS Community Stress Drop Validation Study Using the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence. authors: Rachel Abercrombie, Annemarie Baltay, Shanna Chu, Taka’aki Taira, Dino Bindi, Oliver Boyd, Xiaowei Chen, Elizabeth Cochran, Emma Devin, Douglas Dreger, William Ellsworth, Wenyuan Fan, Rebecca Harrington, Yihe Huang, Kilian Kemna, Meichen Liu, Adrien Oth, Grace Parker, Colin Pennington, Matteo Picozzi, Christine Ruhl, Peter Shearer, Daniele Spallarossa, Daniel Trugman, Ian Vandevert, Qimin Wu, Clara Yoon, Ellen Yu, Gregory Beroza, Tom Eulenfeld, Trey Knudson, Kevin Mayeda, Paola Morasca, James Neely, Jorge Roman-Nieves, Claudio Satriano, Mariano Supino, William Walter, Ralph Archuleta, Gail Atkinson, Giovanna Calderoni, Chen Ji, Hongfeng Yang, and Jiewen Zhang. doi.org/10.1785/0120240158 (in press)

SCEC Activities Code of Conduct

The Statewide California Earthquake Center (SCEC) fosters a diverse and inclusive community where everyone feels safe, productive, and welcome. We expect all participants in SCEC-supported events to uphold this commitment by adhering to the SCEC Activities Code of Conduct.

SCEC Meetings and Workshops

The SCEC Annual Meeting brings together 400-500 participants worldwide to share breakthroughs, assess progress, and chart a collaborative path for earthquake science. All of the Center activities are presented, analyzed, and woven into a set of priorities for SCEC to pursue in the future.